|
GENERAL BUSINESS CONSULTANTS SPECIALISTS IN " SYSTEMS" AND MORE-PROFITABLE OPERATIONS For Distributors, WHOLESALERS, Manufacturers 847 256-3260
|
|
DISTRIBUTORS MAY NOT NEED COMPUTERS ANYMORE The next “new” thing in
information technology for distributors is 50 years old. Its called Software as
a Service (SaaS), and its providers claim it lowers distributors' IT costs by replacing distributors’ computers, IT staff
and software with on-line, off-site data processing; only PC-terminals and printers would be on-site. But is
this reincarnation of an old form of "outsourcing", sometimes called
“utility computing”, really worth pursuing; what are the pros and cons?
Before mini-computers and software packages came on the scene in the late
1970s -- well before PCs -- most distributors could not afford to buy hardware
and then create their own software. But they could get the benefits of data
processing by subscribing to "service bureaus." Until the 1960s, this
arrangement involved mailing copies of documents (e.g. invoices) to a company
which "key punched"
cards, which were then loaded into a room-size computer for processing; reports
were printed and mailed to subscribers. A subscriber paid a small fixed monthly
fee, and paid for the “resources” used – number of transactions processed,
amount of data stored, number of pages printed, etc.
When low-speed data communications became possible in the ‘70s,
subscribers bought terminals and printers, did their own data entry and printed
their documents and reports (overnight). When data communications became much
faster, subscribers were able to do instant on-line inquiries into such data as
stock status, A/R, etc.
Low cost mini-computers and packaged software drove data processing
service bureaus out of business, because it became more cost-effective for
distributors to have their own systems. BACK TO THE FUTURE HOW DOES SAAS WORK? SYSTEM COSTS. Although the SaaS concept is applicable to all sizes of
distributor, most SaaS providers aim at small to medium size distributors, who
find the initial and on-going costs of having their own systems to be
prohibitively expensive. Initial costs include one or more computer servers, a
software license, training and education, and conversion of data from any old
system. On-going costs include a maintenance contract for the server(s), a
contract for vendor-provided software support and updates, one or more in-house
people to answer users’ questions, perhaps annual software license payments,
and data communications circuits for branches. Leases are available, sometimes
including software and installation costs, but leases require a down payment,
and increase the life-cycle cost by
adding interest to the cost of the system. SAAS COSTS. so
lower the charges to subscribers. Even the down payment, if any, to a provider
is usually much ,
they provide subscribers
with more resources than any distributor but the very,
very largest could afford, at PC prices. SOME CONCERNS. Although the savings from using an SaaS can be quite
substantial, this is a new concept for distributors, so there are some things to
be aware of before signing up with an SaaS provider.
If an SaaS does all of a distributor's data processing, that
distributor’s business would be totally dependent on that provider. If that
provider suddenly went out of business, how would the subscribing distributor do
business? how would the distributor get its data back?
And how secure from hackers is that data? Even with exotic data
encryption, hackers figure out how to read secured data. What stops an
unauthorized user from logging into the service like a legitimate user, and
viewing data – or worse, damaging it? Passwords aren’t effective in small
distributorships – all the users exchange them so no one is ever unable to log
into the system.
Monthly fees can increase quickly if users are added. Fees also increase
when a subscriber starts using a module (e.g., activity based costing) that was
not included at the start of the arrangement.
Some providers do not own the software they use, but license it from the
software's author. That license can be terminated by the author under certain
circumstances, which would leave subscribers with zilch. Short of termination,
the contract between an SaaS provider and the author of the software it uses
could allow the author to make such changes as increasing the licensing fees
and/or limiting a subscriber's use of the software.
True SaaS software was written specifically to be used by multiple
subscribers. But some companies that offer SaaS use software that was written to
be used by only one company; it was modified to support multiple companies. That
latter kind of software can lead to unexpected bugs that don't occur when the
software is used by only one company. The author of the latter kind of software
may or may not be the SaaS provider, and if it isn’t, the author may
not be obligated to fix bugs, and SaaS personnel may not know how to do so.
Providers of SaaS for distributors usually require that all user
companies use the software as is;
they won’t make modifications. And subscribers can't make modifications
because they don't possess the "source code" (which is required for
changing software).
Part of the cost reduction claimed by SaaS advertising is achieved by
replacing expensive leased data communication circuits with the use of the
Internet. Use of the Net is cheap, but the
Net
is not totally reliable. If access to the Net becomes temporarily unavailable,
how would a subscriber run its business? The support people at an SaaS that didn’t create its own software may not know the software as well as the author. When subscriber personnel call with questions, SaaS personnel may have to call support people at the author company, thereby delaying a response. |