|
GENERAL BUSINESS CONSULTANTS SPECIALISTS IN " SYSTEMS" AND MORE-PROFITABLE OPERATIONS For Distributors, WHOLESALERS, Manufacturers 847 256-3260
|
|
SYSTEM
CONTRACTS: ADD SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES TO AVOID PROBLEMS One
impact of software “aggregators” buying system providers is that price
competition has decreased, so the prices paid have increased. A more ominous
impact is that the contracts of the survivors now offer fewer protections to
distributors – not that they really offered many before they bulked up on
rivals.
Here are some of the issues that must be addressed in any system contract that
protects a distributor. Addressing them involves adding specific performance
guarantees to the vendor’s agreement.
Viability.
No software company can afford to market, support and enhance several different
software packages. Sooner or later, the stable will contain only a few packages.
But, its not safe to assume that the package with the most user companies will
be one of the survivors; nor is it safe to assume that the most feature-rich
package will survive. Even the continued release of enhancements does not
guarantee that a package will remain viable.
License transfer.
Long before software companies started buying up other ones, distributors
started buying up other distributors. This trend is likely to continue, but some
system contracts give the system provider the right to deny or restrict the
transfer of licenses to an acquiring distributor. Such preclusion could result
in a potential buyer walking away from the deal to buy a distributor who wants
to sell.
Installation services.
People who use on-line auction sites like eBay know that sellers get more money
by selling at a low price but over-charging for shipping. Some software
companies play a similar game by under estimating the number of hours needed to
assist a distributor in changing from the old system to the new one. Its like
handing the vendor a blank check. Similarly, some software companies excessively
increase their annual support fees.
Third party software.
Even though the large software companies own many software packages, there are
some functions not found in any of the owned packages. These functions are
handled by third-party software packages that a software company provides. Some
of the third-party packages work well with some of the owned packages, and
others don’t work so well. Some of the third-party software packages were not
designed specifically for distributors, and may not address the needs of
distributors. And because third-party software was not created by a system
vendor, what would happen if a distributor is sued for misuse by the author of a
third-party software package? Help
with problems.
When the system is down, or some critical function stops working properly, what
kind of help would be provided? If the vendor’s people accidentally corrupt
the data in the system, who pays for restoring it to its proper form? How
quickly would the problem be resolved? How can business be conducted if the
system is down or corrupted for a week? Do you want to stake your business on
best efforts promises? |